Numerical Simulation of the Localized Perturbations Development in the Supersonic Boundary Layer
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-9447-2025-20-1-9-19
Abstract
The development of localized perturbations in the supersonic boundary layer for Mach number M = 2 is numerically investigated. It is found that the leading edge velocity is greater than the trailing edge velocity, which is in agreement with the experimental data. In the leading front oscillations occur as the wave packet moves downstream and their amplitude increases in time. To compare the numerical simulation results with classical stability theory, the wave packet was decomposed into a spectrum on frequencies and wave numbers. The maximum contribution to the total perturbation belongs to waves with angles of inclination of the wave front to the plate leading edge equal to about 60 degrees. Their spatial amplification rate agree well with the data of the stability theory of locally nonparallel flows. The agreement deteriorates at smaller inclination angles due to their smallness relative to the contribution of waves with angles of 60 degrees and the nonlinear interaction with waves of different frequencies, and inclinations.
Keywords
About the Authors
S. A. GaponovRussian Federation
Sergey A. Gaponov - Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Science
Novosibirsk
A. N. Semenov
Russian Federation
Alexander N. Semenov - Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Science
Novosibirsk
A. A. Yatskikh
Russian Federation
Alexey A. Yatskikh - Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Science
Novosibirsk
References
1. Emmons H. W. The laminar-turbulent transition in a boundary layer – part 1. Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, 1951, vol. 19, pp. 490–498. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2010
2. Narasimha R. The laminar-turbulent transition zone in the boundary layer. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1985, vol. 22, pp. 29–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-0421(85)90004-1
3. Mitchner M. Propagation of turbulence from an instantaneous point disturbance. Journal of the Aeronautical Science, 1954, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 350–351.
4. Schubauer G. B., Klebanoff P. S. Contributions to the mechanics of boundary-layer transition. NACA TN-3489. NACA, 1955, 32p.
5. Gaster M., Grant I. An Experimental Investigation of the formation and development of a wave packet in a laminar boundary layer. Proc. Roy. Soc., 1975, A 347, pp. 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1975.0208
6. Gaster M. A theoretical model of a wave packet in the boundary layer on a flat plate. Proc. Roy. Soc., 1975, vol. A347, pp. 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1975.0209
7. Riley J. J., Gad-el-Hak M. The dynamics of turbulent spots. In Frontiers in Fluid Mechanics. Springer, 1985, pp. 123–155.
8. EIder J. W. An experimental investigation of turbulent spots and breakdown to turbulence. J. Fluid Meeh., 1960, vol. 9, pp. 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112060001079
9. CantweIl B., Coles D., Dimotakis P. Strueture and entrainment in the plane of symmetry of a turbulent Spot. J. Fluid Mech., 1978, vol. 87, pp. 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112078001809
10. Gad-el-Hak M., Blackwelder R. F., Riley J. J. On the growth of turbulent regions in laminar boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech., 1981, vol. 110, pp. 73–95.
11. Boiko A. V., Dovgal A. V., Grek G. R., Kozlov V. V. Physics of transitional shear flows: instability and laminar – turbulent transition in incompressible near – wall shear layers. –Dordrecht et al.: Springer, 2012. XXVII, 271 p.
12. Reddy S. C., Henningson D. S. Energy growth in viscous channel flows. J. Fluid Mech., 1993, vol. 252, pp. 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112093003738
13. Grosch C. E., Salwen H. The continuous spectrum of the Orr-Sommerfeld equation, Part 1, The spectrum and the eigenfunctions. J. Fluid Mech., 1978, vol. 87, pp. 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112078002918
14. Grosch C. E., Salwen H. The continuous spectrum of the Orr-Sommerfeld equation, Part 2, Eigenfunction expansions. J. Fluid Mech., 1981, vol. 104, pp. 445–465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112081002991
15. Libby P. A., Fox H. Some perturbation solutions in laminar boundary layer theory, Part 1, The momentum equation. J. Fluid Mech., 1963, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112063001439
16. Gaponov S. A. Quasi-resonance excitation of stationary disturbances in compressible boundary layers. International Journal of Mechanics, 2017, vol. 11, pp. 120–127.
17. James C. S. Observations of turbulent-burst geometry and growth in supersonic flow. NACA TN-4235. NACA. 1958. 19930085190.pdf
18. Krishnan L., Sandham N. D. Effect of Mach number on the structure of turbulent spots. J. Fluid Mech. 2006. Vol. 566 P. 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112006002412
19. Jewell J. S., Leyva I. A., Shepherd J. E. Turbulent spots in hypervelocity flow. Exp. Fluids. 2017. Vol. 58, article number 32. DOI 10.1007/s00348-017-2317-y.
20. Yatskikh A. A., Ermolaev Y. G., Kosinov A. D., Semionov N. V. Hot-wire visualization of the evolution of localized wave packets in a supersonic flat-plate boundary layer. Journal of Visualization, 2017, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 549–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-016-0414-2
21. Krishnan L. and Sandham N. D. Effect of Mach number on the structure of turbulent spots. J. Fluid Mech., 2006, vol. 566, pp. 225–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112006002412
22. Sivasubramanian J., Fasel H. F. Direct numerical simulation of a turbulent spot in a cone boundary layer at Mach 6. AIAA Paper 2010–4599. 2010. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-4599
23. Loytsyansky L. G. Mechanics of fluid and gas. Moscow, Science, 1970. (in Russ.)
24. Dunn D. W., Lin C. C. On the stability of the laminar boundary layer in a compressible fluid. J. Aeronaut. Sci., 1955, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 455–477. doi.org/10.1142/9789814415651_0005
Review
For citations:
Gaponov S.A., Semenov A.N., Yatskikh A.A. Numerical Simulation of the Localized Perturbations Development in the Supersonic Boundary Layer. SIBERIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS. 2025;20(1):9-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-9447-2025-20-1-9-19