Preview

SIBERIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS

Advanced search

Investigation of Transverse Instability of a High-Current Relativistic Electron Beam in a Linear Induction Accelerator

https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-9447-2022-17-1-5-22

Abstract

The article presents the results of studies on the transverse instability of a high-current relativistic electron beam developing in a linear induction accelerator LIA for 5 MeV electron energy, which is created at the BINP SB RAS together with RFNC VNIITF. These results were obtained using a software package that makes it possible to simulate the dynamics of the instability development, as well as to calculate the increment of this instability averaged over the accelerator length. The package consists of four main parts. The first of them, made on the base of a three-dimensional model of the accelerating module electrodynamic system of the LIA, allows calculating the main characteristics of electromagnetic dipole modes of such a module, the second and third parts are designed to find three-dimensional accelerating electric and focusing magnetic fields, respectively. In the last part of the package, a system of ordinary differential equations is solved that describes both the motion of beam macroparticles in electric and magnetic fields, including the eigenmode fields, and the excitation of the mode fields by the electron beam. The adequacy of the physical models used in the software package was tested by comparing the spectra of field oscillations in the accelerator modules obtained in calculations and recorded in the experiment. On the base of the data obtained, the main regularities of the transverse beam instability development in the frequency range ∆f = 0.3–1.1 GHz were revealed, and possible methods for suppressing this instability in the LIA were proposed.

About the Authors

E. S. Sandalov
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

 Evgeniy S. Sandalov, Post-Graduate Student 

Novosibirsk 



S. L. Sinitsky
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

 Stanislav L. Sinitsky, Candidate of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics) 

Novosibirsk 



D. I. Skovorodin
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

 Dmitry I. Skovorodin, Candidate of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics) 

 Novosibirsk 



D. A. Nikiforov
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

 Danila A. Nikiforov, Researcher 

Novosibirsk 



P. V. Logachev
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

 Pavel V. Logachev, Doctor Sciences (Physics and Mathematics), Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences 

Novosibirsk



P. A. Bak
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

 Petr A. Bak, Senior Researcher 

Novosibirsk 



K. I. Zhivankov
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

 Kirill I. Zhivankov, Researcher 

Novosibirsk 



E. K. Kenzhebulatov
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

 Ermek K. Kenzhebulatov, Researcher 

 Novosibirsk 



A. V. Petrenko
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

 Alexey V. Petrenko, Candidate of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics) 

Novosibirsk 



O. A. Nikitin
Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Zababakhin All-Russia Research Institute of Technical Physics”
Russian Federation

 Oleg A. Nikitin, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) 

Snezhinsk 



A. R. Akhmetov
Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Zababakhin All-Russia Research Institute of Technical Physics”
Russian Federation

 Alexander R. Akhmetov, Senior Researcher 

Snezhinsk 



R. V. Protas
Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Zababakhin All-Russia Research Institute of Technical Physics”
Russian Federation

 Roman V. Protas, Candidate of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics) 

 Snezhinsk 



S. D. Khrenkov
Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Zababakhin All-Russia Research Institute of Technical Physics”
Russian Federation

 Sergey D. Khrenkov, Researcher 

 Snezhinsk 



I. A. Zhuravlev
Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Zababakhin All-Russia Research Institute of Technical Physics”
Russian Federation

 Igor A. Zhuravlev, Researcher 

Snezhinsk 



I. V. Penzin
Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Zababakhin All-Russia Research Institute of Technical Physics”
Russian Federation

 Iliya V. Penzin, Researcher 

Snezhinsk 



A. R. Don
Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Zababakhin All-Russia Research Institute of Technical Physics”
Russian Federation

 Anton R. Don, Researcher 

 Snezhinsk 



References

1. Panofsky W. K. H., Bander M. Asymptotic theory of beam breakup in linear accelerators. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 1968, vol. 39, pp. 206–212.

2. Neil V. K., Hall L. S., Cooper R. K. Further theoretical studies of the beam breakup instability. Particle Accel., 1979, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 213–222.

3. Ekdahl C., Coleman J. E., McCuistian B. T. Beam breakup in an advanced linear induction accelerator. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 2016, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1094–1102. DOI 10.1109/TPS.2016.2571123

4. Logachev P., Kuznetsov G., Korepanov A. et al. LIU-2 linear induction accelerator. Instrum. Experim. Techn., 2013, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 672–679. DOI 10.1134/S0020441213060195

5. Starostenko D. A., Logachev P. V., Akimov A. V. et al. Results of operating LIA-2 in radiograph mode. Phys. Particles Nuclei Lett., 2014, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 660–664. DOI 10.1134/S1547477114050264

6. Nikiforov D. A., Blinov M. F., Fedorov V. V. et al. High-current electron-beam transport in the LIA5 linear induction accelerator. Phys. Particles Nuclei Lett., 2020, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 197–203. DOI 10.1134/S1547477120020156

7. Sandalov E S., Sinitsky S. L., Burdakov A. V. et al. Electrodynamic System of the Linear Induction Accelerator Module. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 2021, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 718–728. DOI 10.1109/TPS.2020.3045345

8. Ekdahl C. Tuning the DARHT Long-Pulse Linear Induction Accelerator. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 2013, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2774–2780. DOI 10.1109/TPS.2013.2256933

9. Ekdahl C. Electron-beam dynamics for an advanced flash-radiography accelerator. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 2015, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 4123–4129.

10. Ekdahl C., McCrady R. Suppression of Beam Breakup in Linear Induction Accelerators by Stagger Tuning. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 2020, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 3589–3599. DOI 10.1109/TPS.2020.3019999

11. Briggs R. J., Fawley W. Campaign to minimize the transverse impedance of the DARHT-2 induction linac cells. Lawence Berkeley Nat. Lab. Berkeley, CA, USA, 2002. Tech. Rep.LBNL-56796(Rev-1),

12. Walling L. et al. Transmission-line impedance measurements for an advanced hadron facility. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 1989, vol. A281, pp. 433–447.

13. Flöttman K. ASTRA. Hamburg, DESY, 2000.


Review

For citations:


Sandalov E.S., Sinitsky S.L., Skovorodin D.I., Nikiforov D.A., Logachev P.V., Bak P.A., Zhivankov K.I., Kenzhebulatov E.K., Petrenko A.V., Nikitin O.A., Akhmetov A.R., Protas R.V., Khrenkov S.D., Zhuravlev I.A., Penzin I.V., Don A.R. Investigation of Transverse Instability of a High-Current Relativistic Electron Beam in a Linear Induction Accelerator. SIBERIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS. 2022;17(1):5-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-9447-2022-17-1-5-22

Views: 762


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9447 (Print)